<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 20 Ways to Save Your Dying Newspaper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brandlandusa.com/2008/10/16/20-ways-to-save-your-dying-newspaper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brandlandusa.com/2008/10/16/20-ways-to-save-your-dying-newspaper/</link>
	<description>America's authority on legacy brands. News and comment on classic brands and advertising.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lesson for Newspapers from the Surviving Bits of the N.Y. Herald-Tribune &#124; BrandlandUSA™</title>
		<link>http://www.brandlandusa.com/2008/10/16/20-ways-to-save-your-dying-newspaper/#comment-1023</link>
		<dc:creator>Lesson for Newspapers from the Surviving Bits of the N.Y. Herald-Tribune &#124; BrandlandUSA™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandlandusa.com/2008/10/16/20-ways-to-save-your-dying-newspaper/#comment-1023</guid>
		<description>[...] in saving the actual newspaper? Read our post 20 Ways to Save the Daily. You might not agree with them all, but I think you will find that there are some suggestions that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in saving the actual newspaper? Read our post 20 Ways to Save the Daily. You might not agree with them all, but I think you will find that there are some suggestions that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time article</title>
		<link>http://www.brandlandusa.com/2008/10/16/20-ways-to-save-your-dying-newspaper/#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>Time article</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandlandusa.com/2008/10/16/20-ways-to-save-your-dying-newspaper/#comment-994</guid>
		<description>TIME Magazine article:
Saving Newspapers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TIME Magazine article:<br />
Saving Newspapers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Feng</title>
		<link>http://www.brandlandusa.com/2008/10/16/20-ways-to-save-your-dying-newspaper/#comment-906</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ Feng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandlandusa.com/2008/10/16/20-ways-to-save-your-dying-newspaper/#comment-906</guid>
		<description>Newspapers should stop devoting resources to cover news conferences on the national level, instead get the wire, the people who call news conferences will never answer any real questions anyway so it&#039;s useless to send a reporter to take notes on a prepared statement.  Use that reporter to write an in-depth story that explains the situation in detail.  Have the reporter do investigative research, research WILL be necessary!

The entire model has to change.  Readers already know what the &quot;news&quot; is, they hear about it or read it online well before the print edition comes out.  That means the print edition offers stale &quot;news&quot; that we already heard.  What we need is a comprehensive and detailed analysis that can&#039;t be offered by online sites and radio news summaries.  The routine stuff like Obama says &quot;x&quot; should be printed from a wire service or a pool of reporters.  No way should a reporter from every paper be sent to take dictation.  

Local is important, but again, it has to be investigative or in-depth.  No more blurbs or summaries, those are already available for free and if newspapers want to publish that, then just get it from a wire service, there&#039;s no need to assign a writer to summarize what we already know.  

Stop the obvious biased slant.  In other industries, the customer is always right.  It doesn&#039;t matter if you think you&#039;re biased or not, if the reader thinks so then you have to change.  The readers&#039; opinion is all that matters so it&#039;s time to change the writing/writers until the readers feel the paper is no longer biased.  Many say the biases are cultural and ingrained within the newroom.  If so, then perhaps the entire staff has to be fired and replaced over time.  Because we all tend to hire people who are similar to ourselves or who we can identify with, this may not be possible without firing all the staff at one time and starting over.  Yikes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newspapers should stop devoting resources to cover news conferences on the national level, instead get the wire, the people who call news conferences will never answer any real questions anyway so it&#8217;s useless to send a reporter to take notes on a prepared statement.  Use that reporter to write an in-depth story that explains the situation in detail.  Have the reporter do investigative research, research WILL be necessary!</p>
<p>The entire model has to change.  Readers already know what the &#8220;news&#8221; is, they hear about it or read it online well before the print edition comes out.  That means the print edition offers stale &#8220;news&#8221; that we already heard.  What we need is a comprehensive and detailed analysis that can&#8217;t be offered by online sites and radio news summaries.  The routine stuff like Obama says &#8220;x&#8221; should be printed from a wire service or a pool of reporters.  No way should a reporter from every paper be sent to take dictation.  </p>
<p>Local is important, but again, it has to be investigative or in-depth.  No more blurbs or summaries, those are already available for free and if newspapers want to publish that, then just get it from a wire service, there&#8217;s no need to assign a writer to summarize what we already know.  </p>
<p>Stop the obvious biased slant.  In other industries, the customer is always right.  It doesn&#8217;t matter if you think you&#8217;re biased or not, if the reader thinks so then you have to change.  The readers&#8217; opinion is all that matters so it&#8217;s time to change the writing/writers until the readers feel the paper is no longer biased.  Many say the biases are cultural and ingrained within the newroom.  If so, then perhaps the entire staff has to be fired and replaced over time.  Because we all tend to hire people who are similar to ourselves or who we can identify with, this may not be possible without firing all the staff at one time and starting over.  Yikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly win</title>
		<link>http://www.brandlandusa.com/2008/10/16/20-ways-to-save-your-dying-newspaper/#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly win</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandlandusa.com/2008/10/16/20-ways-to-save-your-dying-newspaper/#comment-901</guid>
		<description>We will have to rely upon the weeklies, not the dailies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will have to rely upon the weeklies, not the dailies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Weatherford</title>
		<link>http://www.brandlandusa.com/2008/10/16/20-ways-to-save-your-dying-newspaper/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Weatherford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandlandusa.com/2008/10/16/20-ways-to-save-your-dying-newspaper/#comment-474</guid>
		<description>Nice post with lots of interesting ideas. I can see how the proposal to get rid of zoned editions has led to calls to have you tarred &amp; feathered - after all, the general understanding is that people want their local news. 

However: The fact is, those zoned editions haven&#039;t worked. Advertising won&#039;t cover the costs and readers essentially ignore them. The problem is that medium- to large-sized papers are terrible at covering small areas or neighborhoods. 

Compare the coverage in any truly local independent newspaper and in the large daily&#039;s attempts - you&#039;ll see why local readers by and large are loyal to their weekly newspapers and disdainful of their bigger daily&#039;s attempts to compete. 

So, to heck with it. Stop wasting your readers&#039; time and your advertisers&#039; money. Buy a small paper if you want to cover small communities - it&#039;ll keep the economies of scale you need - and use the bigger daily to cover bigger stories. That&#039;s what it&#039;s there for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post with lots of interesting ideas. I can see how the proposal to get rid of zoned editions has led to calls to have you tarred &amp; feathered &#8211; after all, the general understanding is that people want their local news. </p>
<p>However: The fact is, those zoned editions haven&#8217;t worked. Advertising won&#8217;t cover the costs and readers essentially ignore them. The problem is that medium- to large-sized papers are terrible at covering small areas or neighborhoods. </p>
<p>Compare the coverage in any truly local independent newspaper and in the large daily&#8217;s attempts &#8211; you&#8217;ll see why local readers by and large are loyal to their weekly newspapers and disdainful of their bigger daily&#8217;s attempts to compete. </p>
<p>So, to heck with it. Stop wasting your readers&#8217; time and your advertisers&#8217; money. Buy a small paper if you want to cover small communities &#8211; it&#8217;ll keep the economies of scale you need &#8211; and use the bigger daily to cover bigger stories. That&#8217;s what it&#8217;s there for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.brandlandusa.com @ 2012-02-08 09:32:57 -->
