<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What a Shortened Name Says About a Brand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brandlandusa.com/2009/08/06/what-a-shortened-name-says-about-a-brand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brandlandusa.com/2009/08/06/what-a-shortened-name-says-about-a-brand/</link>
	<description>America's authority on legacy brands. News and comment on classic brands and advertising.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idoia</title>
		<link>http://www.brandlandusa.com/2009/08/06/what-a-shortened-name-says-about-a-brand/#comment-2202</link>
		<dc:creator>Idoia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandlandusa.com/2009/08/06/what-a-shortened-name-says-about-a-brand/#comment-2202</guid>
		<description>I also think of banks -- B of A for Bank of America, and the unfortunately nicknamed WaMu for Washington Mutual (which, in my opinion, sounds too goofy for a bank nickname and I&#039;m shocked it&#039;s caught on at all).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think of banks &#8212; B of A for Bank of America, and the unfortunately nicknamed WaMu for Washington Mutual (which, in my opinion, sounds too goofy for a bank nickname and I&#8217;m shocked it&#8217;s caught on at all).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by brandexpression</title>
		<link>http://www.brandlandusa.com/2009/08/06/what-a-shortened-name-says-about-a-brand/#comment-2130</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by brandexpression</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandlandusa.com/2009/08/06/what-a-shortened-name-says-about-a-brand/#comment-2130</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by brandexpression [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by brandexpression [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Gallagher</title>
		<link>http://www.brandlandusa.com/2009/08/06/what-a-shortened-name-says-about-a-brand/#comment-2129</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Gallagher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 20:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandlandusa.com/2009/08/06/what-a-shortened-name-says-about-a-brand/#comment-2129</guid>
		<description>You make some great points here. I didn&#039;t know &quot;Kentucky&quot; was trademarked, nor that &quot;Coke&quot; is now a genericized trademark. Great stuff.

I agree that many brands shorten their names in an attempt to be more familiar. However, names function both specifically (they equate to a specific brand) and categorically (they imply quality, culture, or other categorical value). When the name is shortened, the brand runs the risk of juxtaposing their original meaning. In other words, a sophisticated brand can come off sounding… well unsophisticated.

I don&#039;t believe that Radio Shack&#039;s issue is its name or even its brand. Its underlying business strategy is fallow. The new name, &quot;The Shack&quot; won&#039;t overcome these issues, but it is reflective of the lack of quality the chain has become know for.

Mark Gallagher
Brand Expressionist®
BLACKCOFFEE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some great points here. I didn&#8217;t know &#8220;Kentucky&#8221; was trademarked, nor that &#8220;Coke&#8221; is now a genericized trademark. Great stuff.</p>
<p>I agree that many brands shorten their names in an attempt to be more familiar. However, names function both specifically (they equate to a specific brand) and categorically (they imply quality, culture, or other categorical value). When the name is shortened, the brand runs the risk of juxtaposing their original meaning. In other words, a sophisticated brand can come off sounding… well unsophisticated.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t believe that Radio Shack&#8217;s issue is its name or even its brand. Its underlying business strategy is fallow. The new name, &#8220;The Shack&#8221; won&#8217;t overcome these issues, but it is reflective of the lack of quality the chain has become know for.</p>
<p>Mark Gallagher<br />
Brand Expressionist®<br />
BLACKCOFFEE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.brandlandusa.com @ 2012-02-08 13:11:31 -->
